Tuesday, October 7, 2008

Is it a Case of “Greenwashing”... Revisited

This past June 16th I posted a short note called "Is it a Case of 'Greenwashing?" Last week my wife ran across this article she had saved from the Mankato Free Press. I thought it deserved posting.

Article from the Mankato Free Press
, August 5, 2007 by staff writer Tim Krohn.

"Green-Washed" companies in it for Green-Back$ ---- Not Saving Earth


The rugged, yet sensitive trucker in the television ad is driving his big rig along a drab, sepia-toned desert highway.
As the big, diesel 18­-wheeler heads down the road the sky behind the truck turns bright blue, the grass greens, butterflies and birds dart in the air. A pretty young woman walking through a field of now colorful wildflowers smiles coyly at the trucker.

I figured it must be an advertisement for air fresh­ener or maybe an organic lawn fertilizer. Turns out it's put out by some coalition of international ener­gy conglomerates. Their message isn't just that they're burning fossil fuels that spew out a bit less mercu­ry and carcinogens - they're appar­ently cleaning the landscape to its pristine state every time they fire up a coal plant or refine some more gasoline.

Big polluting corpora­tions trying to frame them­selves as environmentally friendly -"greenwashing" themselves - isn't anything new. It started around 1990 on the 20th anniversary of Earth Day as companies scrambled to cover their pitiful environmental records. Nothing like a slick ad campaign to detract from the Exxon Valdez oil slick.

Recently Ford touted its environ­mental commitment by focusing on its hybrid vehicles - even though those hybrids account for one-half of one percent of its fleet and Ford makes money mostly from its big fleet of F-150 trucks which had the worst-in-class fuel efficiency.

BP is even bolder. The gas com­pany's logo, a green and yellow sun­burst, resembles the sunflower logo of many green groups, and they have a slick ad campaign called "Beyond Petroleum." It's supposed to show their commitment to alter­native, renewable and low-polluting fuels. Never mind they're being sued for letting hundreds of thousands of gal­lons of crude oil spill onto the Alaskan tundra or that they face crit­icism around the world for human rights, pollution and safety viola­tions. BP sold solar panels that will save a half-million tons of carbon dioxide over their lifetime. Still, the compa­ny's fossil fuels emit some 1,300 mil­lion tons of carbon dioxide every year.

These days corporate America is refining the way it presents its green facade.

Wal-Mart is doing everything short of sending their "associates" to our homes to screw in the new ener­gy-saving compact fluorescent bulbs in its effort to help us be kind to the Earth.

Bank of America says it will spend $20 billion for sustainable projects.

IBM - known as Big Blue - has launched a Big Green campaign.

If this keeps up, I expect to see the CEO of Exxon holding hands with a Greenpeace volunteer singing "Kumbaya" on the banks of a sparkling clear river teeming with happy fish…Oh, wait, Greenpeace is already spoken for - by McDonald's! Not long ago that would seem far­fetched, but McDonald's has actually teamed up with Greenpeace to fight deforestation in South America.

I don't know about you, but I don't feel better knowing short-sighted, money-driven multinational cor­porations say they're going to take care of our environmental problems.
I still like real environmentalists. They're often unrealistic wing-nuts, but they live what they passionately believe in. Forget Ronald McDonald peddling recyclable Whopper cartons. Give me a guy in non-leather shoes and a banana-leaf shirt chaining himself to an old growth fir tree to stop the bulldozers.

There's some things we can't trust to the Fortune 500. The environ­ment's one of them.

Tim Krohn is a Free Press staff writer. He can be contacted at
(507)344-6383 or
tkrohn@mankatofreepress.com

No comments: